Applications of derivatives (related rates, MVT, optimization, L'Hôpital's rule) Knowledge-Based Study

Math · Calculus · Math · Derivatives

Math topic explanations on Applications of derivatives (related rates, MVT, optimization, L'Hôpital's rule).

Study notes

  1. Understanding Related Rates

    In related rates problems, we study two or more continuously varying quantities that are linked through an underlying geometric or physical equation. When these quantities change over time, their rates of change are related by differentiating the governing equation with respect to time tt using the Chain Rule.

    General Solution Strategy

    1. Identify Given and Desired Quantities: Assign variables to all quantities changing with time and express known rates and target rates as derivatives with respect to tt.
    2. Establish a Relation: Write an equation connecting the variables based on geometric formulas (such as Pythagorean theorem, volume, or similar triangles) or physical laws.
    3. Differentiate with Respect to Time: Apply implicit differentiation with respect to tt, remembering to attach factors such as dxdt\frac{dx}{dt} or dydt\frac{dy}{dt} to each differentiated variable.
    4. Substitute and Solve: Substitute the known values and instantaneous rates only after differentiating, then isolate the unknown rate.

    Illustrative Example

    A spherical balloon is inflated such that its volume increases at a constant rate of 100 cm3/s100\text{ cm}^3/\text{s}. How fast is the radius increasing when the diameter is 50 cm50\text{ cm}?

    The volume of a sphere of radius rr is given by:

    V=43πr3V = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3

    Differentiating both sides with respect to tt:

    dVdt=4πr2drdt\frac{dV}{dt} = 4\pi r^2 \frac{dr}{dt}

    When the diameter is 50 cm50\text{ cm}, the radius is r=25 cmr = 25\text{ cm}. Given dVdt=100 cm3/s\frac{dV}{dt} = 100\text{ cm}^3/\text{s}:

    100=4π(25)2drdt=2500πdrdt100 = 4\pi (25)^2 \frac{dr}{dt} = 2500\pi \frac{dr}{dt}

    drdt=1002500π=125π cm/s\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{100}{2500\pi} = \frac{1}{25\pi}\text{ cm/s}

    Rolle's Theorem

    Let ff be a function that satisfies three hypotheses:

    • ff is continuous on the closed interval [a,b][a, b],
    • ff is differentiable on the open interval (a,b)(a, b),
    • f(a)=f(b)f(a) = f(b).

    Then there exists at least one number c∈(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that f′(c)=0f'(c) = 0.

    The Mean Value Theorem (MVT)

    The Mean Value Theorem generalizes Rolle's Theorem by removing the requirement that f(a)=f(b)f(a) = f(b).

    Theorem: If ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a, b), then there exists a number c∈(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that:

    f′(c)=f(b)−f(a)b−af'(c) = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a}

    Geometrically, this guarantees that there is at least one point on the curve where the instantaneous rate of change (tangent slope) equals the average rate of change (secant slope) across the interval.

    Illustrative Example

    Consider f(x)=x3−xf(x) = x^3 - x on [0,2][0, 2]. Because ff is a polynomial, it is continuous and differentiable everywhere. The average rate of change is:

    f(2)−f(0)2−0=(8−2)−02=3\frac{f(2) - f(0)}{2 - 0} = \frac{(8 - 2) - 0}{2} = 3

    Setting f′(c)=3f'(c) = 3:

    3c2−1=3  ⟹  3c2=4  ⟹  c=43=233c^2 - 1 = 3 \implies 3c^2 = 4 \implies c = \sqrt{\frac{4}{3}} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}

    Since c=23≈1.155∈(0,2)c = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} \approx 1.155 \in (0, 2), the theorem is confirmed.

    Mathematical Optimization

    Optimization involves finding the absolute maximum or minimum value of an objective function subject to practical constraints. According to the Extreme Value Theorem, any continuous function on a closed, bounded interval achieves both an absolute maximum and an absolute minimum.

    Systematic Optimization Procedure

    1. Define Variables and Objective: Identify the quantity to maximize or minimize and write an equation representing it.
    2. Formulate Constraints: Identify equations that relate the independent variables and express the objective function in terms of a single variable.
    3. Determine the Feasible Domain: Establish the physical or geometric boundaries of the single variable.
    4. Locate Critical Points: Find where the derivative of the objective function is zero or undefined within the feasible domain.
    5. Classify Extrema: Use the First Derivative Test, Second Derivative Test, or Closed Interval Method (evaluating the objective function at critical points and endpoints) to confirm the global optimum.

    Illustrative Example

    A farmer has 120 m120\text{ m} of fencing to construct a rectangular enclosure divided into two equal pens by a fence parallel to one of the sides. Find the dimensions that maximize the total enclosed area.

    Let xx be the length of the dividing fence and the two parallel exterior sides (three sections of length xx), and let yy be the length of the remaining two exterior sides.

    The perimeter constraint is:

    3x+2y=120  ⟹  y=60−32x3x + 2y = 120 \implies y = 60 - \frac{3}{2}x

    The objective function is total area A(x)=x⋅yA(x) = x \cdot y:

    A(x)=x(60−32x)=60x−32x2A(x) = x\left(60 - \frac{3}{2}x\right) = 60x - \frac{3}{2}x^2

    Taking the derivative and setting it to zero:

    A′(x)=60−3x=0  ⟹  x=20A'(x) = 60 - 3x = 0 \implies x = 20

    Because A′′(x)=−3<0A''(x) = -3 < 0, the function is concave down everywhere, ensuring that x=20 mx = 20\text{ m} gives a global maximum. Substituting into the constraint gives y=60−32(20)=30 my = 60 - \frac{3}{2}(20) = 30\text{ m}. The maximum enclosed area is 20×30=600 m220 \times 30 = 600\text{ m}^2.

    Indeterminate Quotients

    When evaluating lim⁡x→af(x)g(x)\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}, direct substitution may yield the indeterminate forms 00\frac{0}{0} or ±∞±∞\frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty}. In such cases, the limit cannot be determined by substitution alone.

    Statement of L'Hôpital's Rule

    Theorem: Suppose ff and gg are differentiable on an open interval containing aa (except possibly at aa), and g′(x)≠0g'(x) \neq 0 on this interval (except possibly at aa). If:

    lim⁡x→af(x)=0andlim⁡x→ag(x)=0\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad \lim_{x \to a} g(x) = 0

    or

    lim⁡x→af(x)=±∞andlim⁡x→ag(x)=±∞\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \pm\infty \quad \text{and} \quad \lim_{x \to a} g(x) = \pm\infty

    then:

    lim⁡x→af(x)g(x)=lim⁡x→af′(x)g′(x)\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}

    provided the limit on the right-hand side exists or equals ±∞\pm\infty. Here x→ax \to a may represent a two-sided limit, one-sided limit, or a limit at infinity.

    Handling Other Indeterminate Forms

    • Products (0⋅∞0 \cdot \infty): Rewrite as a quotient: f(x)⋅g(x)=f(x)1/g(x)f(x) \cdot g(x) = \frac{f(x)}{1/g(x)} to obtain 00\frac{0}{0} or ∞∞\frac{\infty}{\infty}.
    • Differences (∞−∞\infty - \infty): Combine fractions via a common denominator or factor out dominant terms.
    • Powers (000^0, ∞0\infty^0, 1∞1^\infty): Let y=[f(x)]g(x)y = [f(x)]^{g(x)}, compute ln⁡y=g(x)ln⁡(f(x))\ln y = g(x) \ln(f(x)), evaluate L=lim⁡ln⁡yL = \lim \ln y, and recover lim⁡y=eL\lim y = e^L.

    Illustrative Example

    Evaluate lim⁡x→0e2x−1−2xx2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x} - 1 - 2x}{x^2}.

    Direct substitution yields 1−1−00=00\frac{1 - 1 - 0}{0} = \frac{0}{0}. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule by differentiating numerator and denominator:

    lim⁡x→02e2x−22x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2e^{2x} - 2}{2x}

    Substituting x=0x = 0 gives 2−20=00\frac{2 - 2}{0} = \frac{0}{0} again. Applying the rule a second time:

    lim⁡x→04e2x2=4(1)2=2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{4e^{2x}}{2} = \frac{4(1)}{2} = 2